Efficacy of Traditional vs. Modern Selection Techniques on Administrative Staff Performance of Dennis Osadebay University, Asaba, Delta State.

Abstract

The performance of administrative staff is fundamental to the operational effectiveness of universities. This study investigated the impact of two traditional selection techniques aptitude tests and background checks on the performance of administrative staff at Dennis Osadebay University, Asaba, Nigeria. A quantitative research design was employed, utilizing a structured questionnaire administered to 150 administrative staff selected through stratified random sampling. Data were analyzed using correlation and regression analyses. The results revealed a statistically significant positive relationship between both selection techniques and staff performance. Aptitude tests showed a moderate positive correlation, as did background checks. Regression analysis confirmed that both are significant predictors, collectively explaining 50.7% of the variance in staff performance. The study concludes that while traditional selection techniques are effective and necessary for assessing cognitive ability and ensuring integrity, they are not sufficient on their own. It is recommended that the University continue to rigorously apply these traditional methods but also consider integrating modern, competency-based techniques to form a more holistic selection system capable of fully predicting and enhancing administrative staff performance in a complex university environment.